The org chart shows structure
We show you the execution risk in your acquisition

Siloed teams, bottlenecked functions, key-person dependencies — we show you the structural problems in 2–4 weeks, while they're still cheap to fix

WHERE THE FINANCIAL RISK SITS

The decisions that shape returns are made in the first 100 days. Most are made on incomplete evidence

01
100-Day Plan
Evidence before decisions compound

100-day decisions lock in reporting lines, team compositions, and resource allocation that shape EBITDA for years. We give you the structural baseline to make them evidence-based.

Validated decisions before they become expensive to reverse.
02
Workstream Execution
Identify barriers before they create costs

VCP workstreams stall when siloed departments, bottlenecked functions, or teams without authority block execution. We identify these barriers before they inflate cost and delay delivery.

Higher programme ROI. Lower execution cost. Faster delivery.
03
Portfolio Intelligence
Early warning before it reaches the P&L

Structural deterioration — siloing, key-person overload, integration fault lines — appears in the network months before it reaches the P&L. Monthly structural reviews provide the early warning financial reporting cannot.

Execution risk addressed when it is still cheap to fix.
See how we work with Value Creation Plans →
THE FINANCIAL STAKES

Organizational structure determines whether your Value Creation Plans deliver

~50%

of post-acquisition value destruction is attributable to people and integration failure — the majority structural, not cultural

Bain & Company — Global M&A Report

20–30%

of the people who hold an organisation's execution capacity together are invisible to the org chart and the data room.

Cross, R. & Parker, A. (2004) — The Hidden Power of Social Networks

3–5%

of individuals typically concentrate the critical knowledge and relationship dependencies that determine whether a VCP delivers.

Cross et al. (2008) — Managing Collaboration

Higher

predictive power for execution velocity from actual collaboration network structure than from org charts, management assessment, or survey data.

Pentland, A. (2012) — The New Science of Building Great Teams, HBR

WHY HUMANDYNAMICS

The alternatives leave gaps that cost money

01
Evidence from behaviour, not self-report

Org charts, surveys, and management interviews reflect perception, not reality. Our analysis is grounded in actual, auditable communication behaviour.

02
The financial risks, not just the structural picture

We connect structural findings to the metrics you track: ARR, operating margin, revenue per employee, retention cost, synergy realisation.

03
Built for VCP execution, not repurposed from HR

People analytics tools were built for HR, not PE deal timelines. Our outputs are structured for operating partner decisions, not HR reporting.

04
2–4 weeks. No survey distribution.

Existing Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, and Slack data. No new software. No survey rollout. Insights in days or weeks, not months.

What structural risks are priced into your current Value Creation Plans?

Whether you are a PE operating partner, a strategic buyer, or a management consultant building a transformation workstream, the conversation starts here.

Request a Consultation